What seems to be the problem, officer? Establishing the foundation for police officers’ expert opinions in motor-vehicle cases Christopher P. Orlando From Issue: 2023 August
Using Sanchez to your advantage Both sides have filed nonsense motions to exclude expert testimony based on hearsay Michelle Buxton Hemesath From Issue: 2022 January
Preparing experts post-Sargon Sargon reaffirmed that expert opinion cannot be speculative or based on conjecture Torsten Bassell From Issue: 2018 October
People v. Sanchez Preparation and opportunity in expert discovery since Sanchez, and avoiding Sanchez issues at trial Ari Friedman From Issue: 2024 April
The roles of expert witnesses in motor-vehicle-accident litigation Understand what each type of expert witness brings to your motor-vehicle case Daniel DeSantisLane Friedman From Issue: 2024 July
The good shepherd Identifying and shepherding your witnesses for trial Mansour Soltanmoradi From Issue: 2024 January
Traumatic-brain-injury experts 101 Ensuring your brain-injured client gets the medical treatment they need Belinda Theam From Issue: 2022 May
Defeating defendant’s “junk science” in a rear-ender trial Taking aim at the biomechanics expert Spencer LucasBenny Khorsandi From Issue: 2019 April
The “money” cross-examination of the one-sided expert Attacking the credibility of the one-sided expert on cross-examination Dan KramerTeresa Johnson From Issue: 2017 October
Use Sargon as your WAZE for examining and presenting expert opinion If your expert is subject to a 402 hearing, you had better know your case law Geraldine Weiss From Issue: 2017 October
The objection “calls for expert opinion” in a medical malpractice deposition When deposing a physician defendant, asking about expectations is an effective way to circumvent objections that the question “calls for expert testimony” Benjamin Ikuta From Issue: 2023 October
The defense expert cross-examination Their expert isn’t actually that cool. Help the jury to see that Case Barnett From Issue: 2021 January
