“Me too” and “not me too” evidence in employment litigation

Proving that an employee harassed or the employer discriminated against similarly situated individuals other than the plaintiff

Genie Harrison
Mary Olszewska
Amber Phillips

From Issue: 2018 October

Preparing experts post-Sargon

Sargon reaffirmed that expert opinion cannot be speculative or based on conjecture

Torsten Bassell

From Issue: 2018 October

Insurance coverage in a “me too” world

Finding coverage for sexual molestation or assault often depends on ambiguity in the insurance Policy

Kirk Pasich

From Issue: 2018 September

Chronic pain

Living with pain for the rest of their lives impacts every aspect of their lives and deserves maximum compensation

Geoff Wells

From Issue: 2018 October

“We meant it when we said it”

In Liberty Surplus v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., the California Supreme Court reaffirms that an “accident” can be the unintended consequence of the insured’s deliberate acts

Jeffrey I. Ehrlich

From Issue: 2018 September

Homeowner’s insurers are prohibited from communicating misleading replacement-cost estimates

Misleading estimates qualify as a misleading statement under the Insurance Code

Ricardo Echeverria
Steven M. Schuetze

From Issue: 2018 September