Attorney’s fees and costs in FEHA cases

Recovery of fees and costs, and statutory offers to compromise, in FEHA cases after Williams and the 2019 statutory amendment to FEHA

Kelly A. Knight

From Issue: 2019 August

Appellate Reports

Cal Supreme Court rules in Augustus v. ABM that the Brinker standard applies to rest breaks and that “on call” rest breaks are not compliant with the law

Jeffrey I. Ehrlich

From Issue: 2017 February

Appellate Reports

Troester v. Starbucks Corp. – The California Supreme Court rejects the use of the de minimus doctrine to allow employers to demand small amounts of uncompensated work for employees

Jeffrey I. Ehrlich

From Issue: 2018 September

Appellate Reports

Under PAGA, employees may not seek penalties for Labor Code § 558 penalties

Jeffrey I. Ehrlich

From Issue: 2020 January

A bankruptcy primer for employment practitioners

What to do if a defendant – or your own client – files bankruptcy

Iris Weinmann
Ted Cohen

From Issue: 2021 May

Arbitrating employment claims

Don’t just turn and run from an arbitration clause; some can be used to your advantage

Joseph M. Lovretovich
Andrew S. Pletcher

From Issue: 2018 August

Appellate Reports

In Dynamex Operations Cal. Supreme Court adopts new test for “employee” vs. “independent contractor.” In Pebley v. Santa Clara Organics, appellate court oks medical care on a lien, even for plaintiffs with insurance

Jeffrey I. Ehrlich

From Issue: 2018 June

Appellate Reports

Brown v. Ralph’s Grocery Co. clarifies the requirements under PAGA for what constitutes a sufficient notice by the employee

Jeffrey I. Ehrlich

From Issue: 2018 December

Administrative remedies can be exhausting for plaintiffs employed by public entities

In the context of employment litigation, “exhaustion” of administrative remedies before filing suit can indeed be exhausting

James H. Cordes

From Issue: 2018 May